MONTREAL -- The union representing customs agents says the new decision by the Canada Border Services Agency to curtail its involvement in assisting other police forces across the country raises safety issues.

The CSBA announced the move on Dec. 24, citing a budget crunch and concerns over "gaps in officers' authorities and protections."

But a vice president for the Customs and Immigration Union said that means fewer raids, fewer seizures and less safety.

"There will be an immediate impact on security," Jean-Pierre Fortin said Sunday.

Source

This seems to be totally against what Vic Toews the Canadian Minister of public safety has been pushing for the last year. And what about keeping us Canadians safe from all those scary terrorists? Why such a sudden change? Why now?

Well I do not think that this is unrelated to the "New North American Security Perimeter", that has been reported to be announced in the next month or so.

In the New North American Security Perimeter (precursor to the North American Union)it is said that The Americans do not trust the Canadians to protect the Northern area of North America. Also that they will utilize biometric data for travelers at airports and land crossings. These two possibilities will render the Canadian customs agents, well rather useless. The Americans do not trust them and want the department of homeland security to be keeping us Canadians safe.

But I know this is only a deal with the United States right? Nothing to do with a North American Union, because Mexico is not involved.

They tried to just push forward with all three parties openly (I use that term very loosely), and the people saw it for what it was while it was called the SSP.

Now a different tactic is being used. The Americans have already signed an almost identical agreement with Mexico.

"The U.S. announced a similar deal with Mexico in March. It included moves to expedite travel and commerce such as secure transit lanes for pre-cleared rail and truck shipments, as well as passenger pre-clearance for individuals." Source

These agreement are exactly what the SSP was. Just with different packaging. All three governments can say, We have not signed into the North American Union. We have only signed a deal with one of our neighboring countries, not both of them. Meanwhile they are or have already signed on to the exact same agreement with the other parties involved.

It is all a slight of the hand trick, and we need to see it for what it is! We are running out of time, very quickly!

Running parallel to Bill C-36, that will hand over the ability to recall consumer products to foreign governments and private corporations. (It also destroys the rule of law in our once great country) There is another threat to Canadian sovereignty.

This threat has been discussed for many years and we have been watching it slowly take shape. The North American Union could now be a reality much quicker then I anticipated.

The National Post recently "broke" a story titled: Tories to announce deal forming North America 'perimeter'. It goes on to say:

"The Conservative government is set to announce a landmark security and trade deal with the United States, designed to create a perimeter around North America and allow people and goods to flow more freely across the border.

Sources suggested that Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Barack Obama will sign the broad-ranging agreement in Washington as early as next month."

The plan is said to new common consumer product regulations, a pre-clearance agreement for goods crossing the border to expedite waiting times and the use of advanced technology to utilize biometric data for travelers at airports and land crossings.
Full storyHERE

The problems with this deal are vast.
New product relation plans and pre-clearance agreements that can dictate what products are being shipped and which ones are not. This could give large corporations that lobby our governments (thus controlling them) the ability eliminate any rising competition. Remember it was David Rockefeller who said "Competition is a sin".

The utilization of biometric data will add to the already emerging big brother system that we are living in. Giving the government the ability to track and trace every move you make is just a bad idea, common sense would tell you.

Canada will be bound into an American system of Homeland Security threw harmonization of Immigration, security and law enforcement policies. This is already becoming evident in Canada threw Bill C-42, An Act to amend the Aeronautics Act that would require Canadian airline carriers that fly over the U.S. to provide the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with passenger information.

The Americans want concentric rings of security and do not trust the Canadians to police the northern perimeter of the continent.

All of this is said to increase our security, improve our trade agreements and improve these issues at the border.

So is the thinned border security and trade advantages really worth becoming harmonized into an American homeland security police state? This is the question that all Canadians should be pondering right now.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin

In recent years two bills (C-51 and C-6) that would have brought us one step closer to becoming Codex Alimentarius compliant failed to pass the the house and senate. Both bills were almost exactly the same thing, but with a few re writes. Thanks to people like constitutional lawyer Shawn Buckley, the people of Canada were alerted about the risks of such bills and acted on them.

But now the federal government has not only re introduced the bill again, they have secretly passed it in the house of commons. Bill C-36 (once again the same bill as the previous two, with only a few re writes) will remove the rule of law in Canada!

How will it do this?

Bil C-36 will provide the framework in which Trade Agreements can become law without Parliamentary Review. This would give the government of Canada the legal OK, to continue on the road to global regulations and global governance.

From Section 37 of Bill C-36
(2)a regulation made under this Act may incorporate by reference documents produced by a person or body other than the minister including by:

(c) a government

from section 2 definitions:

“government” :

(e) a government of a foreign state or of a sub divisions of foreign states

(f) an international organization of states.

The full Bill can be read HERE

"The ability of foreign governments to dictate our Canadian regulations."


Bill C-36 abolishes the law of trespass thus allowing the State access onto private property without any legal recourse.

Bill C-36 for the first time in Canadian history allows warrants to be issued to search private homes without evidence of criminal wrong doing.

Bill C-36 allows the State to seize property without a Court order, without reporting the seizure to a Court, and for an indefinite period.

Bill C-36 allows the State to assume control over the movement of private property without a Court order and without a safety concern.


So how would this bill fit into Codex Alimentarius?

To make that connection we must first take a look at what Codex is. Codex Alimentarius is a program from the world health organization (WHO) to regulate global food standards.

Here is the about us section from the Codex website:
The Codex Alimentarius Commission was created in 1963 by FAO and WHO to develop food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program. The main purposes of this Program are protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations.

In other words a department of the United Nations that plans to regulate the food trade.

This is what I believe to be the "foreign governments" that the bill is referring to. Our food products will be regulated by the United Nations. But that's OK right? They just want to protect us right? Or does this program fall into the United nations admitted and documented plans for a global population reduction by 90%?

Here is a good breakdown of Codex and what it is:



And becoming Codex complaint is only the beginning of the problems with this bill. Since food products are only one part of the list of consumer products. This will also help the process of harmonization into the North American Union. Under this bill Canadian regulations can then be controlled by the United Sates or any private corporation that is involved in the North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA). All without any safeguards for the Canadian people!

And it is very convenient that this bill secretly passed the house at the same time that the American version Bill S510 passed.

If you have not already contact your MP, the time to do so is now! We need to make sure that they know, we are not going to just stand by and allow our sovereignty and rule of law go quietly into the night!

Jim Balsillie was chairman of RIM (makers of Blackberry cell phones), and currently holds the titles of co-CEO and director of the company.

He has made headlines over the last several years, not to mention tremendous popularity for trying to bring an NHL hockey team to the city of Hamilton Ontario twice.

Here is what the main stream media has not been covering. Jim and an international think tank called CIGI.

About CIGI (from their website)

The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) is an international think tank, founded in 2001. CIGI's main purpose is to address international governance challenges through world-class research. CIGI strives to identify and generate ideas for global change by studying, advising and networking with scholars, practitioners and governments on the character and desired reforms to multilateral governance issues. Through conferences, workshops, publications, public events and technology, CIGI aims to raise capacity to effect change in public policy both in Canada and around the world. CIGI gratefully acknowledges the support of the Government of Canada and the Government of Ontario.

But an even more disturbing development was created in 2007. The Balsillie School of International Affairs.

The Balsillie School of International Affairs is an independent academic institution devoted to the study of international affairs and global governance. The school will assemble a critical mass of extraordinary experts to understand, explain and shape the ideas that will create effective global governance. More HERE


This school is teaching its students programs such as: International Economic Governance, Global and Human Security, International Law, Institutions and Diplomacy, and Shifting Global Order. In other words, a University for the future employee's of the new world order.

Jim Balsille is not alone in the project though. Other financial contributors include:

Scotiabank
TD Friends of the Environment Foundation
The University of Waterloo
Wilfrid Laurier University

an anonymous benefactor contributed a multi-million dollar donation in support of The African Initiative, a five-year CIGI program that will research, assess and develop policy solutions to address the socio-economic impacts of climate change on the African continent.

Government support:

Federal
Canadian Foundation for Innovation
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)
Environment Canada
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
The International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT)


Provincial
Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
Ontario Research Fund

International (Public & Government Agencies)
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Geneva Centre for the Public Control of Armed Forces
UK Government Department for International Development (DFID)

See the full list of contributors HERE

The School also receive next to no media coverage, unless it is a useless report like this CTV story

Having a school devoted to global governance, funded by globalist organizations and governments, a front man that has large amounts of popularity in the area, and gets no media coverage = A very bad situation!

In a free country, with people who want to keep their national identity. A school for global governance just does not fit. The globalism that is being taught to the students of The Balsillie School of International Affairs will eradicate Canada's sovereignty through free trade, economics unions, eventually a governmental union called the North American Union, and then the world government.

We need to raise the awareness of educational institutions like this not only in Canada but around the world. Without them, the elite's will not be able to have trained and educated global governance "leaders" in the future.