Elizabeth Strecker of Abbotsford British Columbia did what many Canadians do around the Holiday season, she did some traveling to spend time with her family.

On January 4th 2011 she was at the Calgary airport for her return flight back to Abbotsford. The airport security asked her to go threw the full body scanner and she complied. But there was a problem.

Elizabeth Strecker is a cancer survivor and wears a prosthetic breast. Which showed up on the scan. A security guard then asked her to raise her arms (something that she cannot comfortably do with her left arm since the surgery). According to Strecker: "The arm is full of fluid. I don't know why but it doesn't drain and is very painful." But security did not want to listen to that and insisted that she raise her arms.

She then used her right arm to lift the left one. But it was so painful that I cried, she said. With many people around it was quite an humiliating experience.

Are we all so full of fear that this kind of practice has become acceptable? Not only to put and 82 year old cancer survivor threw an unsafe full body scanner, but to humiliate her and put her threw pain!

What has happened to common sense? Why would any airport security she this woman as a threat? Why are we just blindly following the patterns of the TSA in America? The TSA scans and does it's enhanced pat downs on everyone. Seniors, children, and everyday people.

Is this all really worth it? Is it keeping us Canadians safer or is it just humiliating and demoralizing everyday Canadians?

After talking to, reading from, and watching reports from countless medical "professionals" promoting the practice of water fluoridation and condemning professionals and citizens who stand up against it . It is my time to say enough is enough!

We are consistently lied to about fluoride. Health Canada says that they do not mandate fluoridation, municipalities do. In turn the municipalities say that they go by the Health Canada recommendations. No one even wants to admit that they are responsible.

We get told by many scientists and health care "professionals" that water fluoridation is a cheap and effective measure to prevent tooth decay. Dr. Malcolm Lock the head medical officer of Brant county even went as far as telling me that it is for the poor people, that cannot afford toothpaste.

But here are graphs from two separate studies that so it is not effective at all.
The first is a comparison between fluoridated Vs non fluoridated countries, produced by the fluoride action network.

And the second graph is one I have used many times. It is from a study conducted by statistics Canada. It shows next to no difference between provinces that fluoridate and those who do not.

8 of the top 10 WORST CITIES FOR TEETH are fluoridated (America). The November 2010 issue of Men's Health magazine identified the following 10 cities for WORST TEETH:

1. St. Louis - Fluoridated since 1963
2. Philadelphia - Fluoridated since 1954
3. Newark (NJ) - Not fluoridated
4. Baltimore (MD) -Fluoridated
5. New Orleans (LA) - Fluoridated since 1974
6. Jackson, Mississippi - Fluoridated since 1969
7. Jersey City, New Jersey - Not fluoridated
8. Milwaukee (WI) - Fluoridated since 1953
9. Kansas City (MO) - Fluoridated since 1981
10. Dallas (TX) - Fluoridated since 1966

Health Canada promotes it as completely safe and says that the science showing anything different is "junk" science. Here is a few examples of that "junk" science

thanks to the meticulous research of Dr. Jennifer Luke from the University of Surrey in England - that the pineal gland is the primary target of fluoride accumulation within the body.
Source

As acknowledged by the U.S. National Toxicology Program there is a "biological plausibility" of a link between fluoride exposure and osteosarcoma. The biological plausibility centers around three facts: 1) Bone is the principal site of fluoride accumulation, particularly during the growth spurts of childhood; 2) Fluoride is a mutagen when present at sufficient concentrations, and 3) Fluoride can artificially stimulate the proliferation of bone cells (osteoblasts).
Source

When bone turnover occurs, the potential exists for immune system cells and stem cells to be exposed to concentrations of fluoride in the interstitial fluids of bone that are higher than would be found in serum.
Source

This list could go on and on! To see more please go to fluoridealert.org

In most cases, we are told that fluoride is a natural occurring mineral. Calcium fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral, that is true.

But in 90% of the cases it is Hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium silicofluorides used in water fluoridation. The only difference between the two, is one is a liquid (Hexafluorosilicic acid) and one is the powder form (silicofluorides).

Both are toxic waste from the aluminum and phosphate fertilizer industries. Not the pharmaceutical grade fluoride that is in your toothpaste.

And beyond even the health effects, the effectiveness, or its origins. There is our right to informed consent. According to the
Canadian medical protection association

"For consent to treatment to be considered valid, it must be an “informed” consent. The patient must have been given an adequate explanation about the nature of the proposed investigation or treatment and its anticipated outcome as well as the significant risks involved and alternatives available. The information must be such as will allow the patient to reach an informed decision. In situations where the patient is not mentally capable, the discussion must take place with the substitute decision maker."

Well I don't know about any of you, but I have never had a doctor or dentist explain why I need to drink fluoridated water, and had him/her explain what the possible side effects are. We have never even been given a chance to hold a municipal vote on the issue. Not when the program was first started and not until we the people make it happen. Kitchener/Waterloo is a perfect example of that. After months of public debates from both sides of the argument, the public voted it out of the water.

But it is not regarded as a medical treatment. It is classified a adding a nutrient to the water. That is how they bypass the informed consent. Nothing more then a little word play.

Either sticking a needle in your arm to give you a dangerous vaccine, or adding a so called nutrient to your water, they both have a medical purpose. Which makes them both a medical treatment!

We also are told that the tooth decay that fluoridation prevents saves the health care system untold amounts of money. What they don't mention is the cost of hip fractures, hyperthyroidism, cancer, and so on. Caused by fluoride.

To put it very simply and logically, fluoride is very dangerous, not effective, and costs the tax payers high amounts of money (adding it to the water costs $100,000 a year in the city of Hamilton alone, never mind the cost to the health care system). And on top of that we are consistently lied to about it.

It is time to say enough of the BS and just get it out! If we need it that badly a doctor or dentist can prescribe it, just like any other medication.

5.
Sodium Fluoride, Sodium Silica fluorides, and hexafluorosilicic acid are not natural occurring substances. They are by products of mainly the phosphate fertilizer industry, it literally is toxic waste.

4.
The side effects on human health range from Dental Fluorosis, Arthritis, Reproductive organ damage, Pineal Gland damage, Thyroid Gland, all the way up to bone cancer's.

3.
The research that is used to promote water fluoridation is outdated, and not available even in FIOA request in most cases.

2.
98% of European countries have banned water fluoridation because of the dangers.

1.
No matter how long fluoride has been in your city or towns water, We the people have never been asked about it. The right to informed consent of medical treatment has been thrown right out the window because of a simple case of word play.

We deserve a say in what goes into our bodies. And it is time to stand up and say enough is enough!